So once again we are at the point we reach here in the United States every ten years where we are forced to reshape our Congressional Districts. Some would say this is an extreme exercise in futility and others will say it is necessary to ensure proper representation in our republic. Both are right. Now what if we really go at it and Restate?
Los Angeles, CA Population: 18,710,563
Chicago, IL Population: 9,458,539
Houston, TX Population: 6,997,384
Phoenix, AZ Population: 4,737,270
Philadelphia, PA Population: 6,096,372
Miami, FL Population: 6,166,488
Boston, MA Population: 4,875,390
Seattle, WA Population: 4,018,598
New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.
The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudiceany Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.
So the founders sort of allowed for states to divorce and there is precedent! In 1861 27 counties chose to leave Virginia and became West Virginia. Yes this happened at the beginning of the American Civil War but a precedent is a precedent none the less. So with precedent established let's dive into this rabbit hole of an idea!
Chicago! Why Chicago Maura it's the smallest of your examples? Because it is sort of my back yard and being the smallest is the easiest to deconstruct. So where and how do we draw the lines? I'm going to use existing county lines as opposed to random edges of weird congressional district boundaries. So here are the counties and their population--all data via Wikipedia.
From Illinois we take:
Boone 53,544 persons 288 square miles in area
Cook 5,150,233 persons 945 square miles in area
DeKalb 105,160 persons 635 square miles in area
DuPage 922,921 persons 322 square miles in area
Grundy 50,972 persons 430 square miles in area
Kankakee 109,862 persons 681 square miles in area
Kane 532,403 persons 524 square miles in area
Kendall 128,990 persons 322 square miles in area
Lake 696,535 persons 444 square miles in area
McHenry 307,774 persons 611 square miles in area
Will 690,743 persons 849 square miles in area
So from Illinois we lose: 8,749,137 persons and a total land area of 6,051 square miles. That leaves Illinois with 51,864 square miles of land and a population of 4,063,371.
Wait Maura! That means Illinois will lose 68% of its population!
Yes, you are correct and part of the point of this exercise. Thirty-two percent of the Illinois population and 90% of it's land, is governed by one city, what is locally called "Down State" is often left out or has very Chicago specific laws forced upon an otherwise very rural state--population density of Illinois in this project is 78.34 persons per square mile on average.
A narrow example but I live down state and this is the view from my roof taken last Summer.
Now I happen to be in a more population dense area just outside of St. Louis!
Now part of forming Chicago into a state means we need the entire metropolitan area so what counties do we take from Indiana?
Jasper 33,270 persons 560 square miles
Lake 485,493 persons 499 square miles
Newton 14,011 persons 402 square miles
Porter 170,389 persons 418 square miles
So Indiana donates 703,163 persons and 1879 square miles of land.
So what does the State of Chicago look like?
Population 9,452,300 (almost a mega-city by definition)
Land area of 7,930 square miles
Average population density of 1,192 persons per square mile
No comments:
Post a Comment